> Again, "wrong" is a judgement, not a fact. Whether something is "wrong" depends largely on how negative vs positive the reviewer wants to spin it. 1 + 1 = 3

> Again, "wrong" is a judgement, not a fact. Whether something is "wrong" depends largely on how negative vs positive the reviewer wants to spin it. 1 + 1 = 3 OK, go tell the world that's not wrong. > There's no objective reality to it, only a chosen emotional state at the time of writing. Oh, bullpucky. Mealy-mouthed blather like that is what brought us literal participation trophies. Some things are just wrong.