Using that (or similar, e.g. with [] instead of <>) syntax for generics is common across many languages, not just Rust or C++. You may find it ugly, but there'

Using that (or similar, e.g. with [] instead of <>) syntax for generics is common across many languages, not just Rust or C++. You may find it ugly, but there's plenty of precedent. What do you think would be better?