4 ms·
A good part is that it will do nothing to improve security and will actively harm peoples' ability to type things correctly, and the best part is when it makes
by inetknght 2y ago
A good part is that it will do nothing to improve security and will actively harm peoples' ability to type things correctly, and the best part is when it makes its way into scientific literature and algorithms. Good luck reproducing that which was entered incorrectly!
- _yb2s 2y agoPresumably if something is sufficiently impossible to interact with in any capacity both for the intended audience and nefarious actors, it is also "secure." For example, if your computer keyboard layout is scrambled through a one time pad, where no copies exist except the internal one, inputting non-random data of any kind would be provably impossible. Air gapping is a legitimate security technique. However, in this case the air gap would be between the ears of whoever designed it.