4 ms·
His history is wrong. OO won in large part for a good reason -- it was a way of implementing, if not enforcing, modularity. One that people accepted, unlike LIS
by CurtMonash 14y ago
His history is wrong. OO won in large part for a good reason -- it was a way of implementing, if not enforcing, modularity. One that people accepted, unlike LISP.
- artsrc 14y agoI like modules that are more like objects. I would like to supply parameters to their constructors and be able to refer to them via names. Languages without modules, like JavaScript, support that kind of thing. http://wadler.blogspot.com.au/2009/08/objects-as-modules-in-newspeak.html http://wadler.blogspot.com.au/2009/08/objects-as-modules-in-...