3 ms·
You are Correct. Just sometimes I hear people on the 'right' say we don't really need to take action on X,Y,Z problems, because humans will adapt, and we've be
by FrustratedMonky 2y ago
You are Correct.
Just sometimes I hear people on the 'right' say we don't really need to take action on X,Y,Z problems, because humans will adapt, and we've been around for thousands of years, so we are really just over-reacting.
They ignore that, yeah, humans will be here on a geologic scale, but the US wont, Congress wont, Constitution wont, we're going to collapse into a bunch of warring city states, and where is their precious outrage then? It wont matter if they believed it was all a hoax, when they are dead, but we'll all be dead.
So discussing time scales in short term, <100 years is important. Generally, for planning.
- ben_w 2y agoFor personal planning I'd make it much shorter than a century: in one decade I bought my first home, lost both parents, Brexit happened, I moved country, Covid triggered lockdowns worldwide, and Russia invaded Ukraine. But even on the timescale of 2100 — and 75 years was enough time to go from the height of the British Empire to what is widely considered to be its final end in the form of handing back Hong Kong, so quite reasonable to guess the US will be gone by then — only the most extreme forecasts have a lower global population than today.