4 ms·
Exactly. The discussion is going to change real fast when LLMs are wrapped in some sort OODA loop type thing and crammed into some sort of humanoid robot that
by Teever 2y ago
Exactly.
The discussion is going to change real fast when LLMs are wrapped in some sort OODA loop type thing and crammed into some sort of humanoid robot that carries hedge trimmers.
- nemomarx 2y agowhy would you want to let a LLM have any agentic interface to the real world though
- ctoth 2y agoFantastic question, probably best-answered by these folks! https://docs.innate.bot/docs.innate.bot https://docs.innate.bot/docs.innate.bot
- notahacker 2y agoAnd if you were building "AI" hedge trimmers, why the hell would you think that an LLM was a sensible way to engineer them? Thinks I need my hedge trimmers to do: trim hedges, avoid trimming things that are not hedges, manoeuvre within strict boundaries. Things I don't need my hedge trimmers to be able to do: reply to me in iambic pentameter, turn articles into bullet points, pass a FizzBuzz test
- mitthrowaway2 2y agoUsually, it's because people want to automate real-world tasks that they'd otherwise have to pay a person money to do, and they anticipate an LLM being capable of performing those tasks to an acceptable degree.
- energy123 2y ago> why would you want to let a LLM have any agentic interface to the real world though The various arms race type dilemmas that actors face will create that outcome. If you're a nation state not doing that, you'll lose to a nation state that does. If you're a company not doing that, you'll lose to a company that does.