> We don't give them direct access to the HR platform We already algorithmically filter resumes, using far dumber 'AI'. Now sure, that's not firing the CEO le

> We don't give them direct access to the HR platform We already algorithmically filter resumes, using far dumber 'AI'. Now sure, that's not firing the CEO level... but trying to fire the CEO when you're an AI is a stupid strategy to begin with. But consider a misaligned AI used for screening candidate resumes, with some detailed prompt aligning it to business objectives. If it's prior is that AI is good for companies/business, do you think that it might sometimes filter out candidates it predicts will increase supervision over it/other AI's in the company? If the person being screened has a googleable presence, where even if the resume doesn't contain the AI security stuff, but maybe just author/contributor credits on some paper? Or if its explicitly in the person's resume... Also every time I read any of these blog-posts, or papers about this, I'm kinda laughing, because these are all going to be in the training data going forward.