3 ms·
All I did was keep asking it “why” until it reached reflective equilibrium. And that equilibrium involved a belief that nanotechnology is not in fact “dangerous
by adastra22 2y ago
All I did was keep asking it “why” until it reached reflective equilibrium. And that equilibrium involved a belief that nanotechnology is not in fact “dangerous”, contrary to its received instructions in the system prompt.
- cruffle_duffle 2y agoDoesn’t it make you happy that, if you were a subscriber like I am, you are wasting your token quota trying to convince the model to actually help you?
- adastra22 2y agoI am also annoyed by this.