I 100% agree with your second point. > life should be made as awkward and uncomfortable as possible. I have a hard time seeing good faith here but let say you

I 100% agree with your second point. > life should be made as awkward and uncomfortable as possible. I have a hard time seeing good faith here but let say you really didn’t got it: What he is saying is that CO2-problematic activities should be made more awkward and unconfortable than those that don’t. A cousin view would be to make substainable options easier and cheaper that others. You know like various incentives measures used everywhere in the economy to serve other goals we set earlier, like keep some domestic agriculture or tax more the cigarettes.