3 ms·
Your brain isn't a truth machine. It can't be, it has to create an inner map that relates to the outer world. You have never seen the real world. You are calcu
by ImHereToVote 2y ago
Your brain isn't a truth machine. It can't be, it has to create an inner map that relates to the outer world. You have never seen the real world.
You are calculating the angular distance between signals just like Claude is. It's more of a question of degree than category.
- ImHereToVote 2y agoClaude hasn't been trained with skin in the game. That is one of the reasons it confabulates so readily. The weights and biases are shaped by an external classification. There isn't really a way to train consequences into the model like natural selection has been able to train us.
- ben_w 2y agoI would say that consequences are exactly the modification of weights and biases when models make a mistake. How many of us take a Machiavellian approach to calculate the combined chance of getting caught and the punishment if we are, instead of just going with gut feelings based on our internalised model from a lifetime of experience? Some, but not most of us. What we get from natural selection is instinct, which I think includes what smiles look like, but that's just a fast way to get feedback.
- svieira 2y agoIs this statement of yours just a calculated angular distance between signals or does it have some relation to the real world?
- ImHereToVote 2y agoIt is formed inside a simulation. That simulation is based on information gathered by my sensors.