3 ms·
Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed feedback. It’s incredibly valuable! Let me address your points one by one: 1. Logarithmic plot and spectru
by ashafq 2y ago
Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed feedback. It’s incredibly valuable! Let me address your points one by one:
1. Logarithmic plot and spectrum analyzer: This feature is definitely on my roadmap. I agree that having these visual cues is essential for live tuning and precise adjustments.
2. UI grouping: You’re absolutely right about grouping parameters by EQ band rather than by type of control. Your suggested layout makes a lot of sense, and I’ll admit I took a shortcut by organizing the UI the way it is now. I’ll reference this thread in the corresponding GitHub issue to ensure it’s tracked for improvement.
3. High-pass and low-pass filters: I completely agree these are essential additions. I might explore adding them as a separate mode for the EQ. As for slopes, implementation could be a bit trickier since biquads inherently support only 6 and 12 dB/Oct. I’ll add this as a feature request on GitHub so it can be properly tracked and discussed.
4. Mid/Side mode: This is an intriguing suggestion and could offer a lot of creative possibilities. While it’s a bit more complex to implement, I’ll look into how it could fit into the current architecture.
5. EQ cramping prevention: The current design inherently avoids EQ cramping due to the use of the TDF2 transposed structure for biquads. However, I’ll review other topologies to see if there’s room for further optimization.
Thanks again for such thoughtful feedback. It’s input like this that helps me refine and improve my plugins. Also, feel free to jot down any feature requests in Github.