3 ms·
Supposedly they compensated for that. They have a "Limitations" section in which they discuss some potential pitfalls, including how most alzheimers deaths star
by hex4def6 2y ago
Supposedly they compensated for that. They have a "Limitations" section in which they discuss some potential pitfalls, including how most alzheimers deaths start after age 65.
I will say, it doesn't inspire confidence when Figure 2 of your paper has an enormous typo on it ("Aircarft [sic] Pilots").
I'm not really convinced personally, especially as stuff like Aircarft[sic] pilots seems to be significantly above the average occupation's risk factor. But they also tend to live significantly longer (78 ish?).
It seems to me that navigation is still a reasonable amount of a pilots workload -- just look at the effort to navigate the taxiways at a big airport for example.
A bigger factor in my view would be quality of care -- an airline pilot probably makes significantly more than a taxi driver, and is more likely to have good medical care, in which someone is more attentive to their situation.
- constantcrying 2y agoI have serious doubts about the statistical controls you can do in the presence of very obvious and large confounders. Especially when the thesis doesn't seem to generalize particularly well (as they admit). Is there something cab drivers do, which is radically different from the numerous other driving occupations? Personally I find these very broad studies extremely uninteresting. Without making any accusations, having large,very broad datasets, make it very easy to find something, when there is just noise. What makes me despise it even more are the headlines it generates.