3 ms·

To provide just one counterexample to this obviously false claim, South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018)[1] directly overturned https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_Corp

To provide just one counterexample to this obviously false claim, South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018)[1] directly overturned https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_Corp._v._North_Dakota https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_Corp._v._North_Dakota (1992)[2], which had ruled that mail order (including online) purchases were not subject to sales tax unless the seller had a physical presence in the state. South Dakota v. Wayfair was a 5-4 decision, but not on partisan lines. You can see several more cases here: https://chatgpt.com/share/676316b1-9be0-8008-9586-6181324b113d https://chatgpt.com/share/676316b1-9be0-8008-9586-6181324b11... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Wayfair,_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Wayfair,_Inc. [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_Corp._v._North_Dakota https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_Corp._v._North_Dakota

cogman10 2y ago
That was this court, the Roberts Court. And further, the 5 in favor was the conservative wing of the supreme court +Ginsberg -Roberts. The reason Roberts dissented was Stare decisis. Notice that from your chatgpt query, the majority of the cases were from 201X and beyond. We are now at the point where nearly yearly we are seeing prior precedent overturned. Prior to that it was something that happened maybe once per decade.