4 ms·
Paper on Arxiv (no paywall): [1] No major new results. It's just an observation that, for things for which human processing bandwidth is measurable, it comes a
by Animats 2y ago
Paper on Arxiv (no paywall): [1]
No major new results. It's just an observation that, for things for which human processing bandwidth is measurable, it comes about to 10 bits/sec.
This may simply reflect the writing rate of long-term memory.
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10234 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10234
- 082349872349872 2y ago> This may simply reflect the writing rate of long-term memory I don't think write rate is the bottleneck; consider performance on reaction time tests, eg: https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime https://humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime (for what would we need a LT memory write for this task?) (if I had to take a wild guess, I'd say our scavenging and gathering ancestors never had the need of decision making with cat-like reaction times?)
- xyzzy123 2y agoI don't see how you could do what a table tennis player does in 10 bits/sec. Even if we "distil" the torrent of visual information to (e.g. simplified) heading/speed/spin estimates of the ball and do something similar for desired motor movements.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]