4 ms·

> That's true, TP-Link isn't great about keeping their consumer product firmware secured or updated. ASUS isn't much better but when it comes to network gear, y

> That's true, TP-Link isn't great about keeping their consumer product firmware secured or updated. ASUS isn't much better but when it comes to network gear, you kind of do get what you pay for. If this is actually the case then you should contact the FTC because Asus under an order to pay attention to security: * https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2016/07/ftc-approves-final-order-asus-privacy-case https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2016/07/... I have an Asus RT-AC68U that I bought ages ago that's still getting regular first-party firmware updates (plus the ones from Merlin). Currently using ISP-provided hardware, but given my past experience I'd definitely look at Asus as an option if I needed a new router.

dole 2y ago
I have an Asus RT-AC1200, released in 2019 that hasn't had a firmware update since 2021/05 which is the reason why I bought the TP-Link. I do see Asus has a Nov 2024 firmware for that RT-AC68U on their site. As far as my TP-Link router, I think I remember it being stuck on a 2022/09 firmware until at least 2023/09, and I wound up flashing it with OpenWRT earlier this year.
- throw0101c 2y ago
  The AC1200 series was originally released in 2015: * https://wikidevi.wi-cat.ru/ASUS_RT-AC1200_series https://wikidevi.wi-cat.ru/ASUS_RT-AC1200_series The V2 seems to be exactly the same except for some minor chip revisions (e.g., -DAN vs -AN), perhaps due to OEM part availability. OpenWRT also supports (supported?) the V2: * https://openwrt.org/toh/asus/rt-ac1200_v2 https://openwrt.org/toh/asus/rt-ac1200_v2
  - dole 2y ago
    The RT-AC68U was released in 2013, but I realized that the AC1200 is the consumer tier below the AC68 and related series, so that explains the closer importance on better hardware, easier updating of firmware and development.
iszomer 2y ago
I think it was argued that the reason TP-Link was singled out is because of their pattern of vulnerabilities across their entire product lines going back perhaps a decade(?). The same could probably be said of other brands as well though, if not, more. * https://youtu.be/ZCdZaSu68Kk?si=C7qumnao_bfvGvUo&t=138 https://youtu.be/ZCdZaSu68Kk?si=C7qumnao_bfvGvUo&t=138 * https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=tp-link https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=tp-link

dole 2y ago

I have an Asus RT-AC1200, released in 2019 that hasn't had a firmware update since 2021/05 which is the reason why I bought the TP-Link. I do see Asus has a Nov 2024 firmware for that RT-AC68U on their site. As far as my TP-Link router, I think I remember it being stuck on a 2022/09 firmware until at least 2023/09, and I wound up flashing it with OpenWRT earlier this year.

throw0101c 2y ago
The AC1200 series was originally released in 2015: * https://wikidevi.wi-cat.ru/ASUS_RT-AC1200_series https://wikidevi.wi-cat.ru/ASUS_RT-AC1200_series The V2 seems to be exactly the same except for some minor chip revisions (e.g., -DAN vs -AN), perhaps due to OEM part availability. OpenWRT also supports (supported?) the V2: * https://openwrt.org/toh/asus/rt-ac1200_v2 https://openwrt.org/toh/asus/rt-ac1200_v2
- dole 2y ago
  The RT-AC68U was released in 2013, but I realized that the AC1200 is the consumer tier below the AC68 and related series, so that explains the closer importance on better hardware, easier updating of firmware and development.

iszomer 2y ago

I think it was argued that the reason TP-Link was singled out is because of their pattern of vulnerabilities across their entire product lines going back perhaps a decade(?). The same could probably be said of other brands as well though, if not, more. * https://youtu.be/ZCdZaSu68Kk?si=C7qumnao_bfvGvUo&t=138 https://youtu.be/ZCdZaSu68Kk?si=C7qumnao_bfvGvUo&t=138 * https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=tp-link https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=tp-link