3 ms·
So ... the answer is "yes"? In which case, isn't comparing it to Simulink instead of Sympy a bit ... odd? It's like coming up with a Functional language, and
by tpoacher 2y ago
So ... the answer is "yes"?
In which case, isn't comparing it to Simulink instead of Sympy a bit ... odd?
It's like coming up with a Functional language, and choosing to compare it to Java instead of Haskell.
In any case, interesting language. It would be interesting to see a proper comparison against sympy / symbolic.
(I spotted this, but it's not really a comparison https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7924524/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7924524/ )
- wolvesechoes 2y ago"In which case, isn't comparing it to Simulink instead of Sympy a bit ... odd?" No, as it is not used as Sympy. Modelica is used to model physical systems in a composable way with graphical representation of connections between components. Many people use Simulink for that, so this is why it is compared with it. Sympy is a nice project, but is applied in a different context, definitely not to model systems with thousands of equations in the industrial setting (that would be painful).