4 ms·
Difficult to see how if 1 and 3 are lies, then 4 isn’t also a lie. Either they’re dealing with a threat, which is something to worry about, or they’re not but
by shwaj 2y ago
Difficult to see how if 1 and 3 are lies, then 4 isn’t also a lie. Either they’re dealing with a threat, which is something to worry about, or they’re not but are nevertheless lying to the public, which is something to worry about.
- ravenstine 2y agoIf you don't know what something is, then how do you know it's not a threat?
- shwaj 2y agoThat’s a different question. I was operating under the assumption (from your original post) that 1) and 3) are lies, and inferring from there that 4) would also be a lie. That doesn’t imply that if 3) is true that it’s not a threat. Although, haha, now that I read again, my original conclusion is wrong. If 1) and 3) are lies then that means the drones belong to the USG and they know it. Therefore that would mean that the drones really aren’t a threat. At least not to the USG.