4 ms·
The official information seems to boil down to: 1. The drones are not ours (Unites States). 2. They are not from a foreign country. 3. We don't know what the
by ravenstine 2y ago
The official information seems to boil down to:
1. The drones are not ours (Unites States).
2. They are not from a foreign country.
3. We don't know what they are.
4. There is nothing to worry about.
Who wants to bet that 1 and 3 are lies?
- shwaj 2y agoDifficult to see how if 1 and 3 are lies, then 4 isn’t also a lie. Either they’re dealing with a threat, which is something to worry about, or they’re not but are nevertheless lying to the public, which is something to worry about.
- ravenstine 2y agoIf you don't know what something is, then how do you know it's not a threat?
- shwaj 2y agoThat’s a different question. I was operating under the assumption (from your original post) that 1) and 3) are lies, and inferring from there that 4) would also be a lie. That doesn’t imply that if 3) is true that it’s not a threat. Although, haha, now that I read again, my original conclusion is wrong. If 1) and 3) are lies then that means the drones belong to the USG and they know it. Therefore that would mean that the drones really aren’t a threat. At least not to the USG.
- allturtles 2y ago[0] is the most recent federal government statement. AFAICT, among your claims it only claims (4). [0]: https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/dhs-fbi-faa-dod-joint-statement-ongoing-response-reported-drone-sightings?ref=404media.co https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/dhs-fbi-faa-dod-joint-statement...