Sounds like they failed to perform a threat analysis. And that applies to both sides. The buyer thinks that the bunker will protect them no matter what, and the

Sounds like they failed to perform a threat analysis. And that applies to both sides. The buyer thinks that the bunker will protect them no matter what, and the journalist takes the opposite and equally wrong position that the bunkers are virtually useless. As you correctly point out, they are useful in some situations, and for some people who can afford it they are worth the cost.