> The problem with your analogy is that you chose something with serious undeniable consequences: STIs. Their thesis was that broken JSON also can have serious

> The problem with your analogy is that you chose something with serious undeniable consequences: STIs. Their thesis was that broken JSON also can have serious undeniable consequences, so there is no problem with the analogy AFAICS. > The analogy doesn't work because the person above doesn't grant the severity of consequences of using JSON. Yeah well, can't they be just plain wrong there?