4 ms·
Is it not possible that: You'd be able to look for and find some evidence of their ancestors in Australia and you don't. But there's plenty of it in Africa.
by pvg 2y ago
Is it not possible that:
You'd be able to look for and find some evidence of their ancestors in Australia and you don't. But there's plenty of it in Africa.
- Mountain_Skies 2y agoThat assumes all evidence is equally easy to find and has been equally searched for.
- pvg 2y agoSort of but we're not talking about apes and monkeys here, it's placental mammals in general. So the evidence is overwhelming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammals_of_Australia#Evolutionary_history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammals_of_Australia#Evolution... If we got this wrong, most of paleontology is unreliable.
- pfannkuchen 2y agoAfrica is a static large site of habitation where the disappearance of 99% of evidence would still leave easily findable evidence. In GP’s scenario the habitation would be transient. Not really comparable.