3 ms·

"I have to admit" Call me a nitpicker, but nobody likes those results lol.

• typeofhuman 2y ago
  Have you tried Brave Search? I actually find its AI summary valuable at times.
  • semking 2y ago
    Thanks for the feedback! I just had a chat with a European journalist hours ago... She had questions about the Brave BROWSER... Maybe I should write on Brave Search. They use their own web index. Fully independent!
• danpalmer 2y ago
  I've found it pretty useful. I switched from DDG to Google a few years ago because the knowledge graph results were noticeably better. We only just got AI results here in Australia about a month ago, and so far I've just found even more answers have a correct top result where I don't need to go digging. Disclaimer: I work at Google, but not on anything related to search. I use plenty of non-Google stuff in my personal life so while I am biased, I have every chance to not use their search.
  • semking 2y ago
    Dan, thank you for the comment. Allow me a remark: there's a difference between knowledge GRAPHS that are used internally at Google and knowledge PANELS that are displayed publicly in search results. → Knowledge graphs: sophisticated, internal data structures. → Knowledge panels: visual representations of SOME of the data from knowledge graphs. You were thinking of knowledge PANELS: curated and user-friendly subsets of the internal data! :)
    • danpalmer 2y ago
      ..as I said, the "knowledge graph results" or put another way, "the results based on the knowledge graph".
      • semking 2y ago
        English isn't my native language, so I often misunderstand things. I really thought you were thinking of the graphs. Sorry :-)
• NoPicklez 2y ago
  Reading other responses it seems some people do find them useful