3 ms·
> which is starting to get a bit limiting Extremely limiting given that streaming services are increasingly moving towards timed releases of shows/movies e.g.
by threeseed 2y ago
> which is starting to get a bit limiting
Extremely limiting given that streaming services are increasingly moving towards timed releases of shows/movies e.g. Silo is released on a Friday.
So a popular show could wipe out all capacity with enough people continuously caching a 4k stream.
- lxgr 2y agoWe've known how to efficiently broadcast TV programs to hundreds of millions of viewers simultaneously over satellite for decades now – in fact, that's how it all started :) I wonder how hard it would be to add multicast capabilities to Starlink? Receivers could even cache popular content on a client side disk the way e.g. US satellite TV operators do for local ad insertion.
- buggeryorkshire 2y agoGood point about multicast - BT use it in the UK on their fibre/ADSL network to deliver live TV to their set-top boxes. I have never understood why it's not supported cross-ISP.
- lxgr 2y agoI believe it's very hard to implement across networks in a way that does not require core routers to become quite stateful and/or risks flooding parts of the network with multicast data nobody asked for. There was a short conceptual revival of the multicast idea as an overlay network on top of unicast IP, under the banner of "content-addressable networks", but I haven't heard anything about that in a while.