2 ms·
Treat average employee tenure at the company as a KPI. I've worked at companies that without a question raise all employees to market like clockwork. I've als
by ethbr1 2y ago
Treat average employee tenure at the company as a KPI.
I've worked at companies that without a question raise all employees to market like clockwork.
I've also worked at companies that skimp on raises.
The automatic raise company had tenures in the range of ~10 years, which meant incredible institutional knowledge and contact networks. Consequently, things that would be impossible at other companies were trivial there.
Long tenures can cause their own issues (specifically: not firing people who need to be fired), but are a huge tailwind to productivity, especially at the architect level.
And side observation. If your company is only profitable because you're underpaying your employees, build a different company. If your company is more profitable because you're underpaying employees... you're effectively giving the missing employee salary to shareholders. Gross. Employees are the ones doing the work.
- kiviuq 2y ago> Last I checked, employees are the ones doing the work! By that logic, there wouldn't be any profits at all. All should go to the workers.
- from-nibly 2y agoIt's almost like companies shouldn't try to win a war on two fronts. Instead of having shareholders and customers, just have customers. Then, yes, all the profit would go to the workers/owners.
- ethbr1 2y agoPerfectly fine to make whatever profit the business/market supports. But if a company is making profits while underpaying their employees relative to market rates, yes, that's backwards.