3 ms·
For me, the problem with YubiKeys is not the normal usage. That works great. The problems are the "corner" cases: enrolling new keys, removing old keys, handl
by bsder 2y ago
For me, the problem with YubiKeys is not the normal usage. That works great.
The problems are the "corner" cases: enrolling new keys, removing old keys, handling unintentional destruction of the key. The last one, in particular, is really problematic.
Some of the security mechanisms that a YubiKey provides are an extreme inconvenience. For example, I want to be able to clone my key via some mechanism in case it gets destroyed. I don't want to have to enroll 3 separate keys in every service on the planet just in case I put one in the wash accidentally. That's not possible with a YubiKey--for good reason--but it's a significant annoyance.
We consider "duplicating a physical key" such a common need that we have automated machines to do it at 7 Eleven. The fact that we don't have the same consideration of digital ones is problematic.
- lxgr 2y agoYubikey was even planning working on a FIDO extension that would allow that for a while, but I don't think it went anywhere. It's a real shame, as I'd also love "Yubikey twins" of which I can put one in a safe deposit box and have the other one always with me, without needing to periodically synchronize them to all services I'm using them on.