3 ms·
It seems like we do that not only with tax law in the US, but with every other law, too.
by lenerdenator 2y ago
It seems like we do that not only with tax law in the US, but with every other law, too.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> seems like we do that not only with tax law in the US, but with every other law, too You’re seriously arguing that the EU bureaucracy is streamlined and comprehensible without lawyers? Why do you think every rich person and powerful firm in Europe has fleets of lawyers?
- lenerdenator 2y agoI'm arguing that when court cases in the US are judged, the letter of the law (and thus all of that arcane language) matters more than the spirit of the law, while it seems to be the opposite in the EU for a lot of things.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> when court cases in the US are judged, the letter of the law (and thus all of that arcane language) matters more than the spirit of the law, while it seems to be the opposite in the EU for a lot of things Are we watching the same Supreme Court?
- lenerdenator 2y agoI'm watching the one where they gutted the Chevron decision because they don't want officials, nominated by the elected President, having sway over how regulations are enforced, and instead want judges (who have no real accountability past their confirmation by the Senate) to do that job instead, despite them not having any real expertise in many of the fields that the US federal government regulates. That, to me, sounds a lot like a judiciary that wants to have things decided via the interpretation of legalese by a lawyer instead of by facts as determined by the present will of the people.
- int_19h 2y agoIn US, we have a constitutional protection against bills of attainder.