This seems like an atrociously underpowered study. The issue of non-lawyers just cargo culting the legalese style aside, did they try to actually interrogate w

This seems like an atrociously underpowered study. The issue of non-lawyers just cargo culting the legalese style aside, did they try to actually interrogate whether the plain text descriptions held up to adversarial interpretation? Like take the plain text, hand it to a lawyer with a test case description and let them shoot holes in it.