Too lazy to math, but I asked chatgpt/claude to guestimate TSMC TFR given numbers in article and it returns something absurd like 6. Which has to be wrong. Reg

Too lazy to math, but I asked chatgpt/claude to guestimate TSMC TFR given numbers in article and it returns something absurd like 6. Which has to be wrong. Regardless, article acknowledges TSMC accounts for 20% of Taiwans GDP for 0.3% of population, that kind resources per capita for family friendly policies can't scale. I'd be curious to know actual TFR of this cohort i.e. most affluent famillies I know below 2. Including most religious/conservative who has all the resources (maids etc) to have big families but don't. IMO short of god mandating at least 3 kids, TFR settles belows 2 because most don't want to handle more than 1-2 kids, no matter how wealthy they are. I guess people don't want to drive minivans. Also does this pattern hold for Samsung who accounts for 20% of SKR GDP and employs 0.5% of population?