4 ms·
> but that just goes to show how low our standards have become I totally agree. We need to do better. But I still stand with Qt being a good option. There are
by rubymamis 2y ago
> but that just goes to show how low our standards have become
I totally agree. We need to do better. But I still stand with Qt being a good option. There are ways to lower Qt apps binary sizes down to 11MB[1] or 8.3MB[2].
[1] https://www.qt.io/blog/reducing-binary-size-of-qt-applications-with-qt-6.8-part-2-coffee-machine-example https://www.qt.io/blog/reducing-binary-size-of-qt-applicatio...
[2] https://www.kdab.com/qt-quick-without-a-gpu-i-mx6-ull/ https://www.kdab.com/qt-quick-without-a-gpu-i-mx6-ull/
- int_19h 2y agoQt hails from the era when software was routinely measured in megabytes, so it's designed with that in mind. I suspect that it's QML specifically that contributes the most bloat in this case.