> these models aren't pelican painters or anything like that, they're LANGUAGE models Tools are defined by what people use them for, not by how they were inten

> these models aren't pelican painters or anything like that, they're LANGUAGE models Tools are defined by what people use them for, not by how they were intended—or designed—to be used. (Just ask Nvidia) adding: so I think someone comparing how various tools perform at a task that's valuable to them—and probably others—is just fine, even if it's different from what the creator of the tool intended?