4 ms·
I mean human generations because to do system architecture, design and development well you need something that can at least match an average human brain in rea
by simianparrot 2y ago
I mean human generations because to do system architecture, design and development well you need something that can at least match an average human brain in reasoning, logic and learning plasticity.
I don’t think that’s impossible but I think we’re quite a few human generations away from that. And scaling LLM’s is not the solution to that problem; an LLM is just a small but important part of it.
- munk-a 2y agoI'd be cautious as describing anything in tech as human generations away because we're only about a single human generation into a lot of this industry existing.
- simianparrot 2y agoI understand the hesitancy to do so, but the thing is, what's changed with computers since the inception of the technology is speed and size. The fundamentals are still the same. Programming today is a lot more convenient than programming via punch cards, but it's a matter of abstractions + scale + speed. Given this I'm pretty confident when I say that, but obviously not 100%.