3 ms·
those are well documented. i was talking about this statement > People that were fine with Twitter interfering in elections and censoring people are now upset
by greenie_beans 2y ago
those are well documented. i was talking about this statement
> People that were fine with Twitter interfering in elections and censoring people are now upset that X is interfering in elections and censoring people.
particularly
> are now upset that X is interfering in elections and censoring people
what are some examples of those same people being okay with this?
edit: i did a quick search and couldn't find any examples where the writer of this piece did what you claim.
- systemstops 2y agoI'm going to answer this is good faith, but I suspect you know exactly what I am talking about. I meant people in the plural, generic categorical sense - in the context of the public discourse. I am not picking out this author in particular, but the rather the institutions such as MIT Technology Review that frame the public debate. As an example, see how the NY Times covered these stories - that is what I meant by people - the people who contribute to the public debate.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]