3 ms·
'a judge ordered Mullenweg to remove a controversial login checkbox' remove means gone, not altered or replaced. i think clarification comes next, offering a c
by rolph 2y ago
'a judge ordered Mullenweg to remove a controversial login checkbox'
remove means gone, not altered or replaced. i think clarification comes next, offering a chance to demonstrate lack of contempt before being jailed.
- ted_bunny 2y agoOn what grounds? He changed the statement the box makes by the user. It's silly compliance but O think you really have to go further than this for contempt.
- rolph 2y agonope, in a simple lexicon, all you have to do is piss off any member of the court, this stands for most jurisdictions https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=contempt%20of%20court https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=contempt%20of%20court
- ted_bunny 2y agoAs a process server, this pleases me greatly
- xboxnolifes 2y agoDepends. If an item is ordered to be removed from a store, there isn't an assumption that the shelf be left empty.
- rolph 2y agochanging the wrapper is not removing the item, and the congruity of WithPinapple compared to WordPress is a common obfusication, method. this would be indirect contempt, of court order to the prejudice of the courts authority to mandate injunctive relief
- exsomet 2y agoOne key difference that I suspect the court will consider is that this isn’t a shelf.