3 ms·
"The benefits become noticeable only at p999 onwards; for p90 and p99, the performance is almost the same as SQLite." I hate to be a hater, and I love sqlite a
by high_byte 2y ago
"The benefits become noticeable only at p999 onwards; for p90 and p99, the performance is almost the same as SQLite."
I hate to be a hater, and I love sqlite and optimizations, but this is true.
- feverzsj 2y agoSo, it's almost useless.
- internetter 2y agohttps://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/why-availability/ https://www.kryogenix.org/code/browser/why-availability/
- Sammi 2y agoSo this isn't faster for people running a monolith on one machine. This is only gives faster tail latency in congested multitenant scenarios. So only a narrow gain in a narrow scenario. Cool and all, all progress is good progress, but also not relevant for me or a lot of people.
- bawolff 2y agoThe benchmark seems a bit weird. Fetch 100 results from a table with no filtering,sorting,or anything? That feels like the IO is going to be really small anyways.
- tsegratis 2y agothey compare threads and coroutines for limbo. threads have much worse p90 latencies since they context switch.... im not sure they can draw any conclusions except that coroutines are faster (of course)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]