3 ms·
For me, just comparing Google to Google of 10 years ago it's very clear that Google is terrible now. I haven't found a viable alternative though. Kagi was Ok, b
by hattmall 2y ago
For me, just comparing Google to Google of 10 years ago it's very clear that Google is terrible now. I haven't found a viable alternative though. Kagi was Ok, but nothing seems as good as Google was 10 years ago.
I used Kagi enough to pay for it and I don't like that concept. I thinking having ads in search is completely reasonable, just label them as such and don't cater to ads at the cost of my search terms. I think thought if I'm searching for something and the ad is relevant it's fine to show it and can even help me find out about new products.
But Google is engineered to give you bad results so you do more searches and are more likely to click on an ad.
- jmyeet 2y ago> But Google is engineered to give you bad results so you do more searches and are more likely to click on an ad. Citation needed. I do not believe Google would be a sustainable search business if people were routinely given bad results to keep searching. What concrete examples can you give of what you consider "bad" search results? I'm genuinely curious.