3 ms·
It doesn’t work well on anything where you can’t manage the window width. My eyes have to travel too far to read the content, slowing me down.
by jpollock 2y ago
It doesn’t work well on anything where you can’t manage the window width. My eyes have to travel too far to read the content, slowing me down.
- liontwist 2y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39731878 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39731878
- soulofmischief 2y agoLuu could achieve his goals while still adding basic things like padding, margins and better structuring of his paragraphs. Absolutism on either side of this debate is purely ideological and does little to serve the user the best possible experience.
- liontwist 2y agoI am user who thinks I’m getting a better experience, so I think his main point is right - you are expressing your preference with the voice of the general user, and moderation.
- soulofmischief 2y ago"Better" is subjective and debating such a vague generality will get us nowhere. Instead, I will focus on more objectively measurable aspects such as flexibility and ergonomics. You may be getting the most flexible reading experience, but you are getting the most ergonomic reading experience. You also have to put in up-front work to get a better experience, or rely on tools like Reader mode. If that's what you prefer, that's fine. If you weren't aware, in most browsers you can access the menu bar and navigate to "View -> Page Style", and set it to "No Style". Then you're free to add whatever styles you'd like on top. Meanwhile, the casual, less technical, non-designer user can still engage with the content in an accessible and easily parseable manner.