4 ms·
The more obvious answer would have been to invest in national infrastructure to connect the hydro in the north to the consumers in the south rather than nuclear
by wkat4242 2y ago
The more obvious answer would have been to invest in national infrastructure to connect the hydro in the north to the consumers in the south rather than nuclear.
Either way, she's responsible. The Germans are not. Their actions are an external factor she should have compensated for.
- lawn 2y agoAs others have commented on, it's not enough to just lay new cables and the lack of nuclear energy (or hydro or coal...) in the south is why the energy from the north can't reach the south.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- tcfhgj 2y agoA link would be helpful
- Gud 2y agoEbba Bush Thor has been a proponent of nuclear power investments for a long time. She has only recently come into a position where she can improve the situation. She is not at fault for Swedens disastrous energy politics.