3 ms·
the site now reads a message that they’ll be back shortly, so it was definitely a malicious act. How does this make sense? There didn't seem to be any hard d
by iamdave 18y ago
the site now reads a message that they’ll be back shortly, so it was definitely a malicious act.
How does this make sense?
There didn't seem to be any hard damage done to any part of the site, as the comments said it looked more like an injection attack, so what's malicious? Looks to be more of a prank than anything.
- ConradHex 18y agoI'd say it could be described as "malicious" to redirect a site's traffic to another site, especially an adult one. It's not "good, clean fun", that's for sure. It has consequences for people.
- iamdave 18y agoTrue points, I was more commenting on how the connection between an admission that 'the site was compromised, we're going to take some time to fix things' resulting in a definite conclusion that the attack was malicious worked.