3 ms·
> This notation doesn't require graduate-level statistics knowledge, it's more like stuff that would be covered in a first mathematical course on probability an
by user_7832 2y ago
> This notation doesn't require graduate-level statistics knowledge, it's more like stuff that would be covered in a first mathematical course on probability and statistics.
Perhaps a first course at grad level, but my engineering bachelors covered MLEs but we didn’t learn/use any of those formal language things. I think the core mathematics (and likely other pure science) cohorts were the only people who learnt it.
- defrost 2y agoI slowly transfered out of Trad. Engineering (Civil/Mech/Electrical/Electronic) pretty much because Engineering Math, Chem, and Physics units were almost all "learn these results and how to apply them" and little to no "these are the underpinings of these results". It took six months for Math 100 (Maths for wanna be mathematicians) to "catch up" with the applications being spat out in Math 101 (Maths for people that practically use math for applications) but by the time the foundations were laid almost all the applied math in the Engineering coursework results just became "an exercise for the reader" to derive without need for rote memorisation.
- 082349872349872 2y agoSome balls bases' have arity, bounded more or less / But when they've finite measure, they're the balls that I like best