3 ms·
GPT-3 had 175B, and the original ChatGPT was probably just a GPT-3 finetune (although they called it gpt-3.5, so it could have been different). However, it was
by reissbaker 2y ago
GPT-3 had 175B, and the original ChatGPT was probably just a GPT-3 finetune (although they called it gpt-3.5, so it could have been different). However, it was severely undertrained. Llama-3.1-8B is better in most ways than the original ChatGPT; a well-trained ~70B usually feels GPT-4-level. The latest Llama release, llama-3.3-70b, goes toe-to-toe even with much larger models (albeit is bad at coding, like all Llama models so far; it's not inherent to the size, since Qwen is good, so I'm hoping the Llama 4 series is trained on more coding tokens).
- swyx 2y ago> However, it was severely undertrained by modern standards. at the time, it was trained according to neural scaling laws oai believed to hold.
- reissbaker 2y agoSure, at the time everyone misunderstood Chinchilla. Nonetheless it was severely undertrained, even if they didn't know it back then.