4 ms·
As much as I get frustrated with GPT4's limitations when it comes to code, it's quite good at expanding detailed bullet points into solid design prose. You sti
by mianos 2y ago
As much as I get frustrated with GPT4's limitations when it comes to code, it's quite good at expanding detailed bullet points into solid design prose.
You still have to read it back and triple check it, as you would your own work, but you don't need all the time it takes to extensively expand it from draft.
Also, which it is in context it's quite good at documenting what needs to be done to test it.
- ChrisMarshallNY 2y agoI agree. I have used it for just that.
- pclmulqdq 2y agoI apologize, but GPT4 is absolutely not good at doing that. It is good at adding filler words and a self-important writing style, but if what you have can be expressed in a bullet list, it will not be better expressed by adding fluff and puffery. I can see it being a big aid if you don't know English very well and need it to correct your grammar and word choice, but not much beyond that.
- PittleyDunkin 2y ago> It is good at adding filler words and a self-important writing style That's what they said—design prose!
- mianos 2y agoIt's not adding fluff, it's expanding it to improve the readability. If it just added word fluff, it would be useless. What I do is write an intro paragraph into the context. Sometimes if I have a few lines of code, I'll paste that too. Then, paste my very terse bullets, then ask it: "Concisely expand the following bullets for readability"