> certain name manglings are not guaranteed to be 1:1 and can infact “demangle” into multiple different plausible entities. Now I'm really curious, doesn't tha

> certain name manglings are not guaranteed to be 1:1 and can infact “demangle” into multiple different plausible entities. Now I'm really curious, doesn't that mean some valid C++ code would fail to link for having multiple definitions of the same symbol?? I would expect name mangling to be a bijection from function prototype to string.