3 ms·
No, Apple ended up licensing the patents (Jobs bluster was BS): https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-pays-10m-to-license-palm-other-patents/ https://ww
by adastra22 2y ago
No, Apple ended up licensing the patents (Jobs bluster was BS): https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-pays-10m-to-license-palm-other-patents/ https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/apple-pays-10m-to-li...
- allenu 2y agoThat is quite amusing, but $10M is peanuts to Apple for some necessary patent licenses.
- bryanrasmussen 2y agopeanuts now, but peanuts then?
- function_seven 2y agoYeah, even in 2007 Apple was a huge success already. Worth about $200 billion at the time, was earning about $3.5 billion a year in profit, and had $15 billion cash on hand. https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2007/10/22Apple-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-Results/ https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2007/10/22Apple-Reports-Fo...
- saghm 2y agoIt might not have been fully BS; as the parent commenter mentions, having a paper trail might have been an intentional strategy to try to discourage Jobs from going forward with it.