2 ms·

Thanks for the comment btw. But it doesn't make "what" more real? The argument, the reality we inhabit? How "real" or simulated the world is forms part of the

by m-onz 2y ago

Thanks for the comment btw. But it doesn't make "what" more real? The argument, the reality we inhabit? How "real" or simulated the world is forms part of the conjecture. I would agree the "weak" bit is that it's as speculative as saying that god exists but I don't think a comment on human behaviour is weak because is anthropocentric.

Juliate 2y ago
No it’s weak because it aims to explain reality as a simulation for humans (whereas humans are a tiny irrelevant part of reality), and it does not fundamentally differ from past faiths and religions of humans being played by the gods.