4 ms·
"large enough" and "bath" is doing a lot of work here. I don't think it's necessarily about size. It's about that size and configuration implying the particle s
by BenoitEssiambre 2y ago
"large enough" and "bath" is doing a lot of work here. I don't think it's necessarily about size. It's about that size and configuration implying the particle states are difficult to know.
If for example, you had a large size but the states were knowable because they were all correlated, they were following a functionally predictable path, for example all moving away from the ice cube, or all orderly orbiting around the ice cube in a centrifuge such that they didn't quite touch the ice cube, it wouldn't melt.
- Jensson 2y agoThe ice cube would melt, it would just take longer, heat does transfer through vacuum via radiation. And no, you can't control the positions of the electrons to stop that radiation from happening, it is a quantum effect not something you can control.