5 ms·
some types of content are indisputably disturbing for kids, like violence, war footage, sexualized content (esp. a sexualized female image targeting male kids &
by rmbyrro 2y ago
some types of content are indisputably disturbing for kids, like violence, war footage, sexualized content (esp. a sexualized female image targeting male kids & teens), etc
- cma 2y agoSo outlaw Betty Boop and Jessica Rabbit? Will dating before 21 without a religious chaperone be OK?
- rmbyrro 2y agoyou can be agnostic while not objectifying the female image to a point of forming a generation of young man that are addicted to porn and can't talk and connect to a real women
- cma 2y agoIs this true that men aren't connecting to real women? What's the evidence? US STD rates are up 90% from 2004.
- gosub100 2y agoWe can recruit them to fight in a war, but it might be disturbing to show them what they signed up for.
- Thorrez 2y agoWe can recruit kids to fight in a war?
- ninalanyon 2y agoPeople who are too young to do all or some of vote, drink, drive a car, etc., can join the army in some countries such as the US.
- Thorrez 2y agoI believe I was driving at 14 in the US. The current Michigan law is 14y9m to get a level 1 license. The article was talking about year 8 students in the UK, which is 12-to-13-year-olds. The other commenters in this thread also seemed to be talking about younger kids, not 17-year-olds. Yes, it's important to clarify what age group people are talking about. But we shouldn't automatically assume everyone it talking about military-aged students.
- gosub100 2y agoRecruiters operate in US high schools to reach minors.
- Thorrez 2y agoThe article was talking about year 8 students in the UK, which is 12-to-13-year-olds. The other commenters in this thread also seemed to be talking about younger kids, not 17-year-olds. Yes, it's important to clarify what age group people are talking about. But we shouldn't automatically assume everyone it talking about military-aged students.