Isn't it? The key metric is what fraction of things do actually align with factual reality. The Ouija board is a terrible analogy, because it _never_ aligns wit

Isn't it? The key metric is what fraction of things do actually align with factual reality. The Ouija board is a terrible analogy, because it _never_ aligns with reality. In my experience of using LLMs for various tasks, in _a lot_ of use, the output is very much in line with reality. Coding is not a domain where it shines in this. Natural language based domains, though: they're really good at saying true things and do so _way_ more often than not, to the point one could easily call the former "normal" operation.