4 ms·

So what are the other models we could use ?

Towaway69 2y ago
Perhaps metaphor would be better terminology than models. AI as an animal we are trying to tame. Why does it have to be a machine metaphor? Perhaps AI is a ecosystem upon which we all interact at the same time. The author pointed out that the one-on-one interaction is too slow for the AI - perhaps a many-to-one metaphor would be more appropriate. I agree with the author that we are using the wrong metaphors when interacting with AI but personally I think we should go beyond repeating the mistakes of the past by just extending our current state, I.e. going from a physical desktop to a virtual „desktop“.
- uxhacker 2y ago
  How about powerpoint as a metaphor? The challenge we face is how to explain something complex. But also do we not get into the issue that the Medium is the Message? That just by using voice rather than an image do we not change the meaning. And is that necessarily bad?
  - Towaway69 2y ago
    > And is that necessarily bad? Selecting a metaphor implies that ones imagination is - at least partially - constrained by the metaphor. AI as a powerpoint would make using AI for anything other than presentations seem unusual since that what powerpoint is used for. Also when the original author "models as computers" what does "computer" represent? A mainframe computer the size of small apartment, a smartphone, a laptop, turing machine or some collection of server racks. Even the term "computer" is broad enough to include many forms of interaction. I interact with my smartphone visually while with my server rack textually, yet both are computers. At least initially, AI seems to be something completely different, almost god-like in its ability to provide us with insightful answers and creative suggestions. God-like meaning that judged from the outside, AI has the ability to provide comforting support in times of need, which is one characteristic of a god-like entity. Powerpoint wasn't built to be a god-like provider of answers to the most important questions. It would indeed be a surprising if a PP presentation made the same impact as religious scriptures - to thousands/millions of people, not referring to individual experiences.

Perhaps metaphor would be better terminology than models. AI as an animal we are trying to tame. Why does it have to be a machine metaphor? Perhaps AI is a ecosystem upon which we all interact at the same time. The author pointed out that the one-on-one interaction is too slow for the AI - perhaps a many-to-one metaphor would be more appropriate. I agree with the author that we are using the wrong metaphors when interacting with AI but personally I think we should go beyond repeating the mistakes of the past by just extending our current state, I.e. going from a physical desktop to a virtual „desktop“.

uxhacker 2y ago
How about powerpoint as a metaphor? The challenge we face is how to explain something complex. But also do we not get into the issue that the Medium is the Message? That just by using voice rather than an image do we not change the meaning. And is that necessarily bad?
- Towaway69 2y ago
  > And is that necessarily bad? Selecting a metaphor implies that ones imagination is - at least partially - constrained by the metaphor. AI as a powerpoint would make using AI for anything other than presentations seem unusual since that what powerpoint is used for. Also when the original author "models as computers" what does "computer" represent? A mainframe computer the size of small apartment, a smartphone, a laptop, turing machine or some collection of server racks. Even the term "computer" is broad enough to include many forms of interaction. I interact with my smartphone visually while with my server rack textually, yet both are computers. At least initially, AI seems to be something completely different, almost god-like in its ability to provide us with insightful answers and creative suggestions. God-like meaning that judged from the outside, AI has the ability to provide comforting support in times of need, which is one characteristic of a god-like entity. Powerpoint wasn't built to be a god-like provider of answers to the most important questions. It would indeed be a surprising if a PP presentation made the same impact as religious scriptures - to thousands/millions of people, not referring to individual experiences.