6 ms·
There are 8 billion people whose "things" I am not interested in discovering. Why would I be interested in a random person's things just because they happened t
by EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 2y ago
There are 8 billion people whose "things" I am not interested in discovering. Why would I be interested in a random person's things just because they happened to be physically proximate?
- darkerside 2y agoHow do you know you're not interested in it when you don't know what it is?
- EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 2y agoI don't know but I can give a rough estimate, based on my experience. The estimate equals 0.42%.
- layla5alive 2y agoAlex? :p I'm sure not, but fun to imagine this written by someone I know.
- darkerside 2y agoBeware small sample sizes
- westcoast49 2y agoBecause "things" are interconnected. There's not just one definition of Thing, whatever your thing might be. There's your perspective on Thing, and there's other peoples' perspective on Thing. So, whatever it is, Thing is not something that you can understand in solitude. Understanding it means understanding both your perspective on it, and other peoples' perspective on it, at the same time. That's most peoples' reason for wanting to interact with random people. They see it as an opportunity to refine their understanding of Thing, whatever it might be.