Perhaps the real research doesn't find these bombastic results that "everyone knows are true"? The 'researchers' in the article had a conclusion, the experiment

Perhaps the real research doesn't find these bombastic results that "everyone knows are true"? The 'researchers' in the article had a conclusion, the experiment didn't agree with it and then thought of excuses as to why. >Until then, kids — and their parents — are left with the unfortunate decision between phone addition, and social ostracism. Even this just presumes it's all negative. Why?